Abstract

Unprecedented rates of introduction and spread of non-native species pose burgeoning challenges to biodiversity, natural resource management, regional economies, and human health. Current biosecurity efforts are failing to keep pace with globalization, revealing critical gaps in our understanding and response to invasions. Here, we identify four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid global environmental change. First, invasion science should strive to develop a more comprehensive framework for predicting how the behavior, abundance, and interspecific interactions of non-native species vary in relation to conditions in receiving environments and how these factors govern the ecological impacts of invasion. A second priority is to understand the potential synergistic effects of multiple co-occurring stressors— particularly involving climate change—on the establishment and impact of non-native species. Climate adaptation and mitigation strategies will need to consider the possible consequences of promoting non-native species, and appropriate management responses to non-native species will need to be developed. The third priority is to address the taxonomic impediment. The ability to detect and evaluate invasion risks is compromised by a growing deficit in taxonomic expertise, which cannot be adequately compensated by new molecular technologies alone. Management of biosecurity risks will become increasingly challenging unless academia, industry, and governments train and employ new personnel in taxonomy and systematics. Fourth, we recommend that internationally cooperative biosecurity strategies consider the bridgehead effects of global dispersal networks, in which organisms tend to invade new regions from locations where they have already established. Cooperation among countries to eradicate or control species established in bridgehead regions should yield greater benefit than independent attempts by individual countries to exclude these species from arriving and establishing.

Highlights

  • Invasion science—the systematic investigation of the causes and consequences of biological invasions—is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field

  • Invasion science is a relatively young discipline (Ricciardi and MacIsaac 2008) that has embraced diverse domains in ecology and related fields and has formed linkages with disciplines related to biosecurity—such as epidemiology, risk analysis, resource economics, and vector science (Vaz et al 2017)

  • Non-native species can affect ecological, economic, cultural, and human health in diverse ways (Jeschke et al 2014; Shackleton et al 2018), but we focus on ecological impacts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Invasion science—the systematic investigation of the causes and consequences of biological invasions—is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field. Invasion science is a relatively young discipline (Ricciardi and MacIsaac 2008) that has embraced diverse domains in ecology and related fields (e.g., population biology, biogeography, evolutionary biology, paleoecology, physiology) and has formed linkages with disciplines related to biosecurity—such as epidemiology, risk analysis, resource economics, and vector science (Vaz et al 2017). This multidisciplinary expansion reflects the increasing complexity of biological invasions and their impacts (Richardson 2011; Pyšek et al 2020). Through consensus (see Supplemental Material1), we arrived at four overarching issues that are relevant to a broad range of taxa, environments, and geographic regions and that encompass some of the most important challenges facing our field today (Fig. 1)

The need for greater predictive power: major advances and ongoing challenges
New and future challenges
The way forward: a theoretical framework and tools for impact management
Addressing the challenge of global environmental change in invasion science
Ecological synergies between invasions and climate change
Human responses to climate change that favor nonnative species
Climate adaptation: planting non-native species and adding infrastructure
Resolving the taxonomic impediment
Taxonomic impediments lead to underestimations of invasion
Lack of taxonomic expertise limits our ability to manage invasions
Shifting international trade and travel patterns mediate invasions
Global cooperation among national biosecurity programs
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.