Abstract

The traditional stress arch hypothesis during longwall mining fails to elucidate the formation mechanism of stress arch, and the morphological characteristics and evolution of stress arch are indefinite. To solve these problems, a mechanical model was established for elucidating the formation mechanism of stress arch in overlaying strata. The influencing of key strata on the morphological characteristics of the stress arch was studied. Finally, the evolution of the stress arch during longwall mining was studied through numerical simulation. The results show that the bearing structure of the overlying strata served as the key strata, and the stress arch was formed when the key strata were subjected to deflection after playing a bearing structure role. This was the result of coordination and redistribution of major principal stress in the key strata. The morphological characteristics of the stress arch changed accordingly with the change in key strata. When the thickness of key strata and the distance between key strata and coal seam were gradually increased, the height and width of the stress arch increased accordingly; however, its height was always terminated at the top interface of key strata. At this time, the peak value of the abutment pressure of the working face gradually decreased while the influencing range gradually increased. During longwall mining, the stress arch developed upward by leaps and bounds with the bearing and fracture of key strata. When the overlying key strata were completely fractured, the stress arch disappeared. The results were verified using the field measurement data on the abutment pressure of the Y485 longwall face in Tangshan Mine.

Highlights

  • The arching effect of surrounding rock was first proposed by Ritter when observing the effect of burial depth on the distribution of surrounding rock stress of the tunnel (Ritter, 1879). Engesser (1882), Fayol (1885), Protodyakonov (1909), Terzaghi (1943), and Handy (1985) proposed an arching effect for unbonded soil mass

  • Because the peak value of abutment pressure cannot be monitored from the field measurement data, only the load transfer distance of abutment pressure was analyzed in this study

  • Unlike the key stratum structure objectively existing in the roof strata, a stress arch was formed when the key stratum was subjected to deflection after playing a bearing structure role

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The arching effect of surrounding rock was first proposed by Ritter when observing the effect of burial depth on the distribution of surrounding rock stress of the tunnel (Ritter, 1879). Engesser (1882), Fayol (1885), Protodyakonov (1909), Terzaghi (1943), and Handy (1985) proposed an arching effect for unbonded soil mass. Unlike the KS structure, a stress arch does not exist objectively in the roof strata This is formed when the KS were subjected to deflection after playing a bearing structure role, and it is the result of coordination and redistribution of major principal stress in the KS. When the thickness of the KS remains constant, with increasing distance between the KS and coal seam, the height and thickness of the stress arch in the roof strata gradually increase At this time, the peak value of abutment pressure on both sides of the working face gradually decreases, while the load transfer distance of abutment pressure gradually increases with the Figure 6. The working face was excavated at an interval of 20 m

Results and analysis
Results of field measurements
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call