Abstract
This paper starts by evaluating the relevance of the formal constitutional revision mechanism of the Constitution of the Netherlands. It argues that, although the Dutch constitution has been revised many times, the importance of its article 137 formal revision procedure for Dutch constitutional development should be put into perspective. Secondly, it explores processes of informal constitutional change. It sheds light on such processes by taking different perspectives. It argues that constitutional change outside the formal constitutional revision procedure can best be understood by taking a ‘historical institutionalism’ view. In conclusion, the paper suggests that, in the Dutch context, informal process of constitutional change have been much more important than formal constitutional revision and that, therefore, the theme of informal constitutional change should be the central concern of anyone who seeks to understand Dutch constitutional development.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have