Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different modeling methods and tree structural parameters extracted from airborne LiDAR for estimating carbon emissions reduction and assess their reliability as Certified Emission Reduction (CER) assessment techniques.Methods: LiDAR data was collected from an afforestation project in Beijing, China. Various modeling methods, including statistical regression and machine learning algorithms, were used to estimate biomass and carbon emissions reduction. The models were evaluated under two schemes: tree-species-specific modeling scheme (Scheme 1) and all-sample modeling scheme (Scheme 2) using cross-validation and compared with ground-based estimations and pre-estimated emission reductions.Results: Totally, the biomass estimation models in scheme 1 showed better accuracy than scheme 2. In scheme 1, The Random Forest (RF) and Cubist models achieved the highest prediction accuracy (R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 22.87 kg, CV RMSE = 52.00 kg), followed by GDBT and Cubist, with SVR and GAM performing the weakest. In scheme 2, Cubist model had the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.75, RMSE = 33.95 kg, CV RMSE = 36.05 kg), followed by RF and GBDT, with SVR and GAM performing the weakest. LiDAR-based estimates of carbon emissions reduction were closer to ground-based estimations and higher than pre-estimated values.Conclusion: This study demonstrates that LiDAR-based models using tree structural parameters can accurately assess carbon emissions reduction. The models outperformed traditional methods in terms of cost and accuracy. Considering tree species in the modeling process improved the accuracy of the models. LiDAR technology has the potential to be a reliable assessment technique for carbon emissions reduction in forestry projects. The pre-trained models can be used for multiple predictions, reducing the cost of carbon sink surveys. Overall, LiDAR-based models provide a promising approach for assessing carbon emissions reduction and can contribute to mitigating climate change.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call