Abstract

The paper examines the peculiarities of the application of the positive experience of legislative activity of foreign countries in regulating criminal liability for interference in the activities of judicial bodies and judicial institutions of Ukraine. Various approaches to the legal regulation of criminal liability for interfering in the activities of judicial bodies (judicial authorities) are analyzed. It is stated that the criminalization of the act in the national legislation is due to a number of different factors, including the peculiarities of certain branches of law and legal culture. Тhe description of the signs of a criminal offense in a separate norm of the criminal law is not in itself a sign of its effectiveness. The fact that in the vast majority of foreign countries interference in the work of automated systems of judicial bodies and institutions of justice is carried out within the criminal law protection of the use of computers, systems and computer networks and networks or information security, does not indicate that national law considers criminal offenses against justice to be less socially dangerous.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call