Abstract
We present two cases of tsunami victim identification where the DNA profile from compact bone gave an authentic DNA profile, while the DNA profiles obtained from adhering soft tissue or bone marrow gave different, incorrect profiles. The source of the contaminating DNA is unclear; the possibility that this occurred via transfer of putrefaction liquid in stacked bodies, or dispersal of contaminating material during conservation with formalin is discussed. We recommend the exclusive use of carefully sampled compact bone without adhering tissue as source of DNA to avoid misidentification in similar cases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.