Abstract
This essay provides an analysis of the rhetoric surrounding Cindy Sheehan during the height of her popularity in August and September 2005. This analysis reveals that grief can function as a form of public argument, thus contributing a more nuanced understanding of what G. Thomas Goodnight has termed the public and personal spheres of argument. Sheehan's question—”For what noble cause did my son die?”—disrupted the cultural legibility of soldiers' wartime deaths. Although personalization strategies in the media attempted to reify the boundaries between the personal and public spheres of argument, Sheehan's calls for a public accountability for her grief opened up spaces for public deliberation and anti-war advocacy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.