Abstract
We present a study on the investigation of the proper secondary phases for engineering magnetic flux pinning centers in textured Gd–Ba–Cu–O bulk superconductors. Compared with the joint TiO2 and BaO2 doping methods, the addition of BaTiO3 shows a relevant advantage due to its perovskite structure. Both TiO2 and BaO2 doping tends to enter the crystal lattice of the superconducting matrix by ionic substitution, which leads to the variable peak effect in the Jc–B diagram. The BaTiO3 doping method shows a unique pinning behavior, which is attributed to the distinctive precipitations generated by the additions. The composition of the BaTiO3 doping-related precipitation appears to be controlled under different growth temperatures. The self-field Jc improved by nearly double at 77K in a sample grown with a low growth temperature. In addition, the second peaks caused by various types of additions are located in a narrow field range of 1.25–1.5T in the Jc–B diagram, indicating that the dilute doping follows a unique tendency, which is likely relevant to anisotropic crystal growth. The different observed peak heights suggest the existence of several average pinning potentials provided by various types of additions. BaTiO3 doping exhibited a stabilization of the unique onset superconducting transition temperature. Therefore, BaTiO3 can be classified as a useful dopant to control flux pinning behavior in Gd–Ba–Cu–O bulk superconductors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.