Abstract

Numerous problems of relevance in physiology and biomechanics, have at their core, the presence of a deformable solid matrix which experiences flow-induced strain. Often, this fluid–structure interaction (FSI) is directed the opposite way, i.e. it is solid deformation that creates flow, with the heart being the most prominent example. In many cases, this interaction of fluid and solid is genuinely bidirectional and strongly coupled, with solid deformation inducing flow and fluid pressure deforming the solid. Although an FSI problem, numerous cases in biomechanics are not tractable via the traditional FSI methodologies: in the internal flows that are of interest to use, the number and range of fluid passages is so vast that the direct approach of a deterministically defined boundary between fluid and solid is impossible to apply. In these cases, homogenisation and statistical treatment of the material-fluid system is possibly the only way forward. Such homogenisation,quite common to flow-only systems through porous media considerations, is also possible for FSI systems, where the loading is effectively internal to the material. A prominent technique of this type is that of poroelasticity. In this paper, we discuss a class of poroelastic theory techniques that allow for the co-existence of a multitude of – always statistically treated – channels and passages of widely different properties: termed multiple-network poroelasticity (or multicompartmental poroelasticity). This paradigm is particularly suitable for the study of living tissue, that is invariably permeated – perfused – by fluids, often different in nature and across a wide range of scales. Multicompartmental poroelasticity is capable of accounting for bidirectional coupling between the fluids and the solid matrix and allows us to track transport of a multitude of substances together with the deformation of the solid material that this transport gives rise to or is caused by, or both. For the purposes of demonstration, we utilise a complex and physiologically very important system, the human brain (specifically, we target the hippocampus), to exemplify the qualities and efficacy of this methodology during the course of Alzheimer’s Disease. The methodology we present has been implemented through the Finite Element Method, in a general manner, allowing for the co-existence of an arbitrary number of compartments. For the applications used in this paper to exemplify the method, a four-compartment implementation is used. A unified pipeline is used on a cohort of 35 subjects to provide statistically meaningful insight into the underlying mechanisms of the neurovascular unit (NVU) in the hippocampus, and to ascertain whether physical activity would have an influence in both swelling and drainage by taking into account both the scaled strain field and the proportion of perfused blood injected into the brain tissue. A key result garnered from his study is the statistically significant differences in right hemisphere hippocampal NVU swelling between males in the control group and females with mild cognitive impairment during high and low activity states.

Highlights

  • Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) methods allow for the coupling of solid and fluid mechanics phenomena, and enable the study of processes that involve the exchange of loads between the fluid and solid (Dowell and Hall, 2001)

  • The stratified results indicate that female CHC subjects possessed on average higher flow rates for the left ICA, right ICA, and vertebral artery (VA) compared to the male CHC cohort, whilst for the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects, this trend was reversed (MCI males possessed higher flow rates)

  • This paper describes a three-dimensional multicompartmental poroelasticity model for perfused parenchymal tissue coupled with an automated image-based model personalisation workflow, and a subject-specific blood flow variability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) methods allow for the coupling of solid and fluid mechanics phenomena, and enable the study of processes that involve the exchange of loads between the fluid and solid (Dowell and Hall, 2001). Traditional FSI methods can capture the flow field in the channels/passages and the deformation field of the solid matrix, Fig. 1b, since it is straightforward and computationally feasible to mesh the two domains (in a wide variety of ways) and solve the coupled problem. For the latter figure, it becomes extremely difficult, and in most cases computationally intractable, to discretise the multitude of fluid channels, as well as the fine solid ligaments and strands that define them; it is clear that an alternative is needed. An approach that is often used, originally in geotechnical engineering and groundwater studies and as of recently in increasing frequency within the field of biomedical engineering, is that of poroelasticity

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.