Abstract

The interaction flowfield of gaseous jets ejecting from three different orifice configurations into a Mach 5 turbulent crossflow over a flat plate was investigated experimentally. These jet configurations have equal equivalent throat diameter of 6 mm and nominal exit Mach number of 3. Schlieren photography was used to visualize the spatial flow structures; meanwhile surface oil flow patterns were employed to identify the separation and reattachment regions on the flat plate. Results show the influence of the jet-to-freestream static pressure ratio and jet configurations on flow interaction characteristics.

Highlights

  • The jet in crossflow (JICF) technique has widespread applications in both aerospace and civil industries

  • The flowfield relevant to multiple jets injecting into a high speed mainstream typically occurring in engineering fields introduces additional mutual interaction, which further complicates the flowfield structures and interaction characteristics

  • Results demonstrate high speed transverse jet penetration scales with jet-to-freestream stagnation pressure ratio

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The jet in crossflow (JICF) technique has widespread applications in both aerospace and civil industries. The interaction of a single orifice jet perpendicularly injected into a super/hypersonic crossflow exhibits highly complicated flow phenomena, including shock/boundary layer interaction, shock/shock interaction, flow separation and reattachment as well as complex spatial vortices. Schetz et al [4] conducted an experimental investigation on single and dual jets with velocity ratios from 3 to 8, spacing from 2 to 6 diameters, and injection angles of 90, 75, and 105 deg. X. Li et al [5] to understand the flow structures and the mechanism of amplification factors on a single jet nozzle installed on a flat plate and revolution body. The present paper focuses on the flow visualization of gaseous jets discharging from three different orifice configurations (single, dual and triple in-line) interacting with a hypersonic freestream. The separation regions around the jets on the flat plate were determined by surface oil flow

Facility and Model Geometry
Test Conditions and Boundary Layer
Visualization Methods Used
Typical Free Multiple Jet Flow Structures
Pressure Ratio Effects on Multiple Jet Interaction Flow Structures
Jet Configuration Effects on Spatial and Surface Interaction Flow Structures
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.