Abstract

In this work, we are concerned with the theoretical and numerical analysis of the pressure build-up on the cap of an aquifer during CO2 injection in saturated porous rock formations in all flow regimes of the problem. The latter are specific regions of the parameter space of the plume flow, defined by the CO2-to-brine relative mobility and the buoyancy parameter (injection pressure to buoyancy pressure scale ratio). In addition to the known asymptotic self-similar solutions for low buoyancy, we introduce two novel ones for the high buoyancy regimes via power series solutions of asymptotic self-similarity equations. The explicit results for the peak value of pressure on the cap, which arises in the vicinity of the well, are derived and discussed for all flow regimes. The analytical results derived in this work are applied for the purpose of cap integrity considerations in six test cases of CO2 geological storage from the PCOR partnership, most of which correspond to high buoyancy conditions. The validity of the self-similar solutions (late time asymptotics) is verified with CFD numerical simulations performed with the software Ansys-Fluent. The result is that the self-similar solutions and the associated pressure estimations are valid in typical injection durations of interest, even for early times.

Highlights

  • It has been observed that the global temperature has increased over the years, causing adverse climatic effects

  • It is worth mentioning that related technologies for CO2 capture and storage (CCS) are still under development and much focus is devoted from the oil and gas industry, because it presents similarities with enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and enhanced gas recovery (EGR)

  • We performed an analysis regarding the pressure build-up in the flow regimes arising in the CO2 injection problem in saturated porous rock formations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been observed that the global temperature has increased over the years, causing adverse climatic effects. The physical process of CO2 sequestration into the subsurface is usually described by a nearly immiscible multiphase flow of the supercritical CO2 and the resident fluid, for example, see the literature [18,19,20,21,22,23] The difference in their densities leads to buoyancy effects mobilizing the carbon dioxide to reach the cap of the formation relatively fast, creating vertical gravity segregation between the CO2 (layering on the top) and the brine (recedes at the bottom) in the formation.

Theoretical Analysis
Schematic representation of of the the CO
Pressure Analysis in the Flow Regimes of Plume Evolution
Numerical
Numerical Modeling
Results and Discussion
Comparison the Solution
Pressure Build-Up Analysis for Cap Integrity Considerations
The calculations c k 2busing the numerical
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call