Abstract

Some basic characteristics of a classic hydraulic jump flow over a pebbled rough bed, as well as on a smooth bed as a reference, are presented in this experimental study. For the experiments, an inflow Froude number Fr1from 1.54 to 4.94 and inflow Reynolds number Re1from 42 000 to 230 000 were considered. Visual observations and measurements suggested some differences between the formation of a hydraulic jump on rough and smooth bed configurations, including different air entrainment processes, larger vortical structures in the roller length and stronger backward flow in the upper layer. Furthermore, the jump roller and aerated flow lengths were shorter on a pebbled rough bed than on a smooth bed, while the dimensionless advection velocity of large vortices was the same for both bed types. The instantaneous jump toe perimeter showed the largest variation at the largest Fr1and was generally larger on rough bed than on smooth bed. Larger oscillations of the free-surface profile were observed on smooth bed, highlighting that roughness resulted in smaller free-surface oscillations, suggesting the higher rate of energy dissipation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.