Abstract

The objective of the present investigation is to establish a benchmark experimental data base for a generic hypersonic vehicle shape for validation and/or calibration of advanced computational fluid dynamics computer codes. This paper includes results from the comprehensive test program conducted in the NASA Ames 3.5-ft Hypersonic Wind Tunnel for a generic all-body hypersonic aircraft model. Experimental and computational results on flow visualization, surface pressures, surface convective heat transfer, and pilot-pressure flowfield surveys are presented. Comparisons of the experimental results with computational results from an upwind parabolized Navier-Stokes code developed at NASA Ames demonstrate the capabilities of this code. HE advanced computational fluid dynamics (CFD) com- puter codes being developed for use in the design of such hypersonic aircraft as the National Aero-Space Plane (NASP) and other hypersonic vehicles require comparisons of the com- putational results with a broad spectrum of experimental data to fully assess the validity of the codes and to develop confi- dence in the numerical simulation procedures. This is particu- larly true for complex flowfields with such features as bound- ary-layer transition and turbulence, rapid flow expansions, and leeside flow with the attendant flow separation and vor- tices. Validated codes for such flowfields will be critical to the development of the NASP and other hypersonic vehicles. Therefore, the objective of the present investigation is to es- tablish a benchmark experimental data base for a generic hy- personic vehicle shape for validation and/or calibration of advanced CFD computer codes. This is being done by con- ducting a comprehensive test program for a generic all-body hypersonic aircraft model in the NASA Ames 3.5-ft Hyper- sonic Wind Tunnel to obtain pertinent surface and flowfield data over a broad range of test conditions. Experimental and computational results on flow visualization, surface pressures, surface convective heat transfer, and pitot-pressure flowfield surveys will be presented in this, paper. Of particular signifi- cance, comparisons of the experimental results with computa- tional results from the NASA Ames UPS code (an upwind parabolized Navier-Stokes solver) will be shown to demon- strate the capabilities of this code. Some comparisons of the data with computations from approximate inviscid methods will also be given.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call