Abstract

The sina qua non of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is numerous tumor emboli especially within overlying dermal lymphatics. The explanation remains a mystery. In human studies comparing IBC with non‐IBC, although common tumor parameters such as Ki‐67 index, mitotic count and nuclear size show a close overlap, there is a dramatic exponential difference in embolic density in IBC v non‐IBC. Using contrasting properties of two IBC xenografts, Mary‐X and Karen‐X, this study offers a novel explanation and proposed mechanism to explain the very high embolic numbers in IBC. The explanation is geometric budding of emboli. Mary‐X exhibits florid lymphovascular invasion in vivo which give rise to high numbers of CTCs and pulmonary metastases whereas Karen‐X lacks these features. Mary‐X also gives rise to compact spheroids in vitrowhich exhibit dramatic budding whereas Karen‐X exhibits only loose non‐budding aggregates. Furthermore Mary‐X emboli also bud into daughter emboli in vivo. The mechanism that regulates the compactness of the spheroids as well as the emboli involves the generation of E‐cad/NTF1, a calpain‐mediated cleavage product of membrane E‐cadherin. Inhibiting the generation of E‐cad/NTF1 by blocking either the calpain site of cleavage (SC) or the site of binding (SB) with specific decapeptides both reduces spheroid compactness and decreases budding. Since E‐cad/NFT1 retains the p120ctn binding site but loses both the β‐catenin and α‐binding sites, promoting its 360° distribution around the cell’s membrane, the varying levels of expression of this truncated molecule may trigger budding of both the spheroids as well as the emboli. Recurrent and geometric budding of parental emboli into daughter emboli then would account for the plethora of IBC tumor emboli seen in patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call