Abstract

was pollinated by two bumblebee pollinators, Bombus honshuensis and B. diversus. B. diversus was a secondary pollinator when both pollinators were present, but in the absence of B. honshuensis, B. diversus pollinated I. umbrosus, and the resulting seed production was comparable to when visited by the two bumblebee species together. Not only the high visitation frequency of B. diversus but also the low ratio of seed to ovules (= average seed set × fruit set) of I. umbrosus compensated for the low pollination efficiency of B. diversus. Since, the low pollination efficiency of B. diversus, based on the finding that the low average seed set of I. umbrosus did not require a definite morphological match between flowers and pollinators, and did not require very frequent visitations to each flower. In other words, Isodon umbrosus could briefly maintain constant seed production under the condition of the low ratio of seeds to ovules (the low seed set and the low fruit set) and a large number of flowers without B. honshuensis as legitimate pollinator. On the other hand, I. effusus was exclusively pollinated by B. diversus and produced almost the same volume of seeds as I. umbrosus. Isodon effusus had fewer flowers than I. umbrosus, but this smaller number of flowers was compensated for by the high ratio of seeds to ovules in I. effusus, which was maintained by frequent visitations of the morphologically matched pollinator, B. diversus.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call