Abstract

A population’s spatial structure affects the rate of genetic change and the outcome of natural selection. These effects can be modeled mathematically using the Birth-death process on graphs. Individuals occupy the vertices of a weighted graph, and reproduce into neighboring vertices based on fitness. A key quantity is the probability that a mutant type will sweep to fixation, as a function of the mutant’s fitness. Graphs that increase the fixation probability of beneficial mutations, and decrease that of deleterious mutations, are said to amplify selection. However, fixation probabilities are difficult to compute for an arbitrary graph. Here we derive an expression for the fixation probability, of a weakly-selected mutation, in terms of the time for two lineages to coalesce. This expression enables weak-selection fixation probabilities to be computed, for an arbitrary weighted graph, in polynomial time. Applying this method, we explore the range of possible effects of graph structure on natural selection, genetic drift, and the balance between the two. Using exhaustive analysis of small graphs and a genetic search algorithm, we identify families of graphs with striking effects on fixation probability, and we analyze these families mathematically. Our work reveals the nuanced effects of graph structure on natural selection and neutral drift. In particular, we show how these notions depend critically on the process by which mutations arise.

Highlights

  • Evolution proceeds by the arrival and fixation of mutations

  • We explore the range of possible effects of graph structure on natural selection, genetic drift, and the balance between the two

  • Our work reveals the nuanced effects of graph structure on natural selection and neutral drift

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The fate of each new mutation depends on selection (how the mutation affects the organism’s fitness) as well as drift (random chance). Spatial population structure can alter the balance between these two forces [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Other structures suppress selection, reducing the role of fitness and increasing the role of random drift. Spatial structure can change the accumulation rate of neutral mutations, which do not affect fitness [14]. The effects of spatial structure on selection have consequences for microbial evolution [15], cancer [16,17,18,19,20], aging [19, 20], and infectious disease [21]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call