Abstract

Sound symbolism refers to an association between phonemes and stimuli containing particular perceptual and/or semantic elements (e.g., objects of a certain size or shape). Some of the best-known examples include the mil/mal effect (Sapir, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 225–239, 1929) and the maluma/takete effect (Köhler, 1929). Interest in this topic has been on the rise within psychology, and studies have demonstrated that sound symbolic effects are relevant for many facets of cognition, including language, action, memory, and categorization. Sound symbolism also provides a mechanism by which words’ forms can have nonarbitrary, iconic relationships with their meanings. Although various proposals have been put forth for how phonetic features (both acoustic and articulatory) come to be associated with stimuli, there is as yet no generally agreed-upon explanation. We review five proposals: statistical co-occurrence between phonetic features and associated stimuli in the environment, a shared property among phonetic features and stimuli; neural factors; species-general, evolved associations; and patterns extracted from language. We identify a number of outstanding questions that need to be addressed on this topic and suggest next steps for the field.

Highlights

  • Sound symbolism refers to an association between phonemes and stimuli containing particular perceptual and/or semantic elements

  • We use the term sound symbolism to refer to an association between phonemes and particular perceptual and/ or semantic elements

  • Phoneme /i/ is sound symbolically associated with smallness. This phoneme maps onto smallness indirectly, by way of its sound symbolic association, allowing teeny to be indirectly iconic. This is the relevance of sound symbolism to language: it provides one mechanism by which words can be nonarbitrarily associated with their meanings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sound symbolism refers to an association between phonemes and stimuli containing particular perceptual and/or semantic elements (e.g., objects of a certain size or shape). We use the term sound symbolism to refer to an association between phonemes and particular perceptual and/ or semantic elements (e.g., large size, rounded contours).1 These associations arise from some quality of the phonemes themselves (e.g., their acoustic and/or articulatory features), and not because of the words in which they appear. An example of this could be when a word denoting something small contains phonemes that are sound symbolically associated with smallness (i.e., an instance of indirect iconicity, discussed later).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.