Five Big, Big Five Issues

Abstract

Original Articles and ReviewsFive Big, Big Five IssuesRationale, Content, Structure, Status, and Crosscultural AssessmentBoele De RaadBoele De Raad Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:September 14, 2006https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.3.2.113PDFView Full Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit SectionsMoreAbstractThis article discusses the rationale, content, structure, status, and cross-cultural assessment of the Big Five trait factors, focusing on topics of dispute and misunderstanding. Taxonomic restrictions of the original Big Five forerunner, the “Norman Five,” are discussed, and criticisms regarding the lexical hypothesis are refuted. The main issue of the psycholexical approach, namely, coverage of the trait domain, is elaborated upon, and the logic of the circumplexical structuring of the trait variables is summarized. A distinction is made between the common status of the Big Five approach, with a description of the competing positions of the Big Five model and other personality models, and the particular status of the Big Five approach, including its role as a general communication medium of personality traits. Finally, a review of recent, psychometrically based comparisons among different taxonomies is provided, lending support to the Big Five model as the main working hypothesis, on the one hand, but also showing discrepancies between languages, particularly as regards Factor V. References Allport, G. W. , Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycholexical study. Psychological Monographs , 47, No. 211. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Austin, J. L. (1970). Philosophical papers. London: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Bond, M. H. (1979). Dimensions of personality use in perceiving peers: Cross-cultural comparisons of Hong Kong, Japanese, American, and Filipino university students. International Journal of Psychology, 14, 47–56. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Brokken, F. B. (1978). The language of personality. Meppel, The Netherlands: Krips. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Caprara, G. V. , Perugini, M. (1994). Personality described by adjectives: Generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality, 8, 357–369. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–507. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 58, 69–90. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Church, A. T. , Katigbak, M. S. , Reyes, J. A. S. (1996). Toward a taxonomy of trait adjectives in Filipino: Comparing personality lexicons across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 10, 3–24. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Coan, R. W. (1972). Measurable components of openness to experience. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 346. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Costa, P. T., Jr. , McCrae, R. R. (1976). Age differences in personality structure: A cluster analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 564–570. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15–29. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. , Di Blas, L. , Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality, 12, 19–41. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. , Hendriks, A. A. J. , Hofstee, W. K. B. (1992). Towards a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 6, 301–319. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. , Hofstee, W. K. B. (1993). A circumplex approach to the five factor model: A facet structure of trait adjectives supplemented by trait verbs. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 493–505. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. , Mulder, E. , Kloosterman, K. , Hofstee, W. K. B. (1988). Personality-descriptive verbs. European Journal of Personality, 2, 81–96. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. , Perugini, M. , Szirmák, Z. (1997). In pursuit of a cross-lingual reference structure of personality traits: Comparisons among five languages. European Journal of Personality, 11, 167–185. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. , Perugini, M. , Hrebícková, M. , Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212–232. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar De Raad, B. , Van Heck, G. L. (1994). The fifth of the Big Five. Special Issue of the European Journal of Personality, 8, 225–356. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Di Blas, L. , Forzi, M. (1994). A further step towards the Italian taxonomy of personality descriptive terms.Unpublished manuscript. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Di Blas, L. , Forzi, M. (1997). Refining an Italian Trait Taxonomy by integrating simple and circumplex models: The abridged Big Three Circumplex Structure.Unpublished manuscript. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Digman, J. M. (1972). The structure of child personality as seen in behavioral ratings. In R. M. Dreger, (Ed.), Multivariate personality research . Baton Rouge: Claitors' Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Digman, J. M. , Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Eysenck, H. J. (1992). The definition and measurement of Psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 757–785. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Goldberg, L. R. (1976). Language and personality: Toward a taxonomy of trait descriptive terms. Istanbul Studies in Experimental Psychology, 12, 1–23. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler, (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger, J. N. Butcher, (Eds), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203–234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Hendriks, A. A. J. (1997). The construction of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI).Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Hofstee, W. K. B. , De Raad, B. (1991). Persoonlijkheidsstructuur: De AB5C-taxonomie van Nederlandse eigenschapstermen [Personality structure: The AB5C-taxonomy of Dutch traitterms]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 46, 262–274. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Hofstee, W. K. B. , De Raad, B. , Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Hofstee, W. K. B. , Kiers, H. A. L. , De Raad, B. , Goldberg, L. R. , Ostendorf, F. (1997). Comparison of Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11, 15–31. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Hrebícková, M. (1995). The structural model of personality based on the lexical analysis: A Czech replication study of the Five-Factor Model based on a comprehensive taxonomy of personality-descriptive adjectives.Unpublished report, Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar John, O. P. (1990). The Big Five factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin, (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar John, O. P. , Angleitner, A. , Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar McCrae, R. R. (1994). Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8, 251–272. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structures in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 573–583. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Norman, W. T. (1967). 2800 Personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population.Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, MI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit [ Language and personality structure: Towards the validity of the Five-Factor Model of personality]. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer-Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Peabody, D. (1987). Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 59–71. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Saucier, G. , Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the Five-Factor Model. In J. S. Wiggins, (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality (pp. 21–50). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Sneath, P. H. A. , Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Strelau, J. , Angleitner, A. , Bantelmann, J. , Ruch, W. (1990). The Strelau Temperament Inventory Revised (STR-R): Theoretical considerations and scale development. European Journal of Personality, 4, 209–235. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Szarota, P. (1996). Taxonomy of the Polish personality-descriptive adjectives of the highest frequency of use. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 343–351. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Szirmák, Z. , De Raad, B. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95–117. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Tupes, E. C. , Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings.USAF ASD Technical Report, No. 61–97. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Zuckerman, M. (1994). An alternative Five Factor model of personality. In C. F. Halverson, G. A. Kohnstamm, R. P. Martin, (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 53–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Zuckerman, M. , Kuhlman, D. M. , Camac, C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? A factor analysis of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96–107. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe Big Five Personality Traits and Brain Arousal in the Resting State26 September 2021 | Brain Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 10The three-component dimension-based model of self-brand user image congruence19 August 2021 | Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 25Gibt es die „resiliente Persönlichkeit“?6 March 2021 | Spiritual Care, Vol. 10, No. 2Comprehensive psycholexical classification of Polish person-descriptive terms16 April 2019 | Current Issues in Personality Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 2Incidental focus on form and the role of learner extraversion22 March 2017 | Language Teaching Research, Vol. 22, No. 6References14 August 2018The Fantasy Questionnaire: A Measure to Assess Creative and Imaginative Fantasy14 June 2017 | Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 5Ontologies About Human BehaviorA Review of Knowledge Modeling SystemsAngel Blanch, Roberto García, Jordi Planes, Rosa Gil, Ferran Balada, Eduardo Blanco, and Anton Aluja7 September 2017 | European Psychologist, Vol. 22, No. 3Kulturelle Diversity und transkulturelles Leadership30 November 2016Comparing Facebook Users and Facebook Non-Users: Relationship between Personality Traits and Mental Health Variables – An Exploratory Study1 December 2016 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 12Resilience Variables and Posttraumatic Symptoms Among Maltreated Youth4 November 2016 | Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, Vol. 25, No. 9Similar Personality Patterns Are Associated with Empathy in Four Different Countries8 March 2016 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7Major personality traits and regulations of social behavior: Cheaters are not the same as the reckless, and you need to know who you’re dealing withJournal of Research in PersonalityEntscheidungen im Top-Management18 February 2016Beyond the Big Five: New Directions for Personality Research and Practice in OrganizationsAnnual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 2, No. 1Personality and Adaptive BehaviorsPersonality Psychology: Lexical Approaches, Assessment Methods, and Trait Concepts Reveal Only Half of the Story—Why it is Time for a Paradigm Shift8 February 2013 | Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, Vol. 47, No. 1Class, gender and time poverty: a time-use analysis of British workers’ free time resources5 September 2012 | The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 63, No. 3Die Einschätzung der Differenz von Wissen und Nichtwissen bei Unternehmensberatern — Ergebnisse eines universellen Strukturgleichungsmodells9 September 2016 | Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 64, No. 3The influence of neuroticism on spatial presence and enjoyment in filmsPersonality and Individual Differences, Vol. 51, No. 7Personality as a moderator of context effects on academic achievementJournal of School Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 2If money does not make you happy, consider time15 March 2011 | Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 2Immersion in Mediated Environments: The Role of Personality TraitsCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 13, No. 3The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some RuminationsPsychological Inquiry, Vol. 21, No. 1Self‐service technology for sales purposes in branch bankingInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 27, No. 7A Structural Validation of an Inventory Based on the Abridged Five Factor Circumplex Model (AB5C)Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 91, No. 5Life success of males on nonoffender, adolescence-limited, persistent, and adult-onset antisocial pathways: follow-up from age 8 to 42Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 2Assessing Young Adolescents' Personality With the Five-Factor Personality Inventory29 February 2008 | Assessment, Vol. 15, No. 3Temporal Aspects of Life Satisfaction16 August 2006 | Social Indicators Research, Vol. 80, No. 3Personality, Culture Fit, and Job Outcomes on Australian Antarctic Stations26 July 2016 | Environment and Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 3Maintaining Wellbeing during Unemployment21 June 2016 | Australian Journal of Career Development, Vol. 15, No. 1Mixed Methods in International Collaborative Research: The Experiences of the International Study of Parents, Children, and Schools25 July 2016 | Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 40, No. 1Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitationJournal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 64, No. 1Application of the Five-Factor Model of Personality to Intergenerational PerceptionThe Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol. 58, No. 3Hostility, unemployment and health status: testing three theoretical modelsSocial Science & Medicine, Vol. 56, No. 10Vocational and social outcomes of adults with chronic aphasiaJournal of Communication Disorders, Vol. 35, No. 6Millennial Contrarianism: The Five-Factor Approach to Personality Description 5 Years LaterJournal of Research in Personality, Vol. 35, No. 1Personality and Adaptive BehaviorsThe accumulation of problems of social functioning as a long-term process: Women and men compared30 June 2016 | International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 24, No. 4Measuring safety climate: identifying the common featuresSafety Science, Vol. 34, No. 1-3Instincts and personalityPersonality and Individual Differences, Vol. 27, No. 2The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI)Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 27, No. 2The notion of personality: historical and recent perspectives13 July 2009 | European Review, Vol. 7, No. 1 Volume 3Issue 2June 1998ISSN: 1016-9040eISSN: 1878-531X InformationEuropean Psychologist (1998), 3, pp. 113-124 https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.3.2.113.© 1998Hogrefe & Huber PublishersKeywordsTrait structureBig Fivecrosscultural comparisonstaxonomyPDF download