Abstract
The crystals doped with Ce3+ are utilized as various optical materials such as solid-state lasers, scintillators, and phosphors. Since the 4f-5d transition energy of Ce3+ in crystals strongly depends on the coordination environment, it is important to understand the relationship between the energy levels and the coordination environment for theoretical design of novel optical materials. For this purpose, garnet solid solutions are useful as host crystals since the physical properties can be modified by forming variety of solid-solutions through cation substitution. For example it is known that the 4f-5d transition energy of Ce3+ in Y(Al1-xGax)5O12 increases monotonically as x increases [1]. In this work, in order to investigate the relationship between the 4f-5d transition energy and the coordination environment of Ce3+ in Y(Al1-xGax)5O12, first-principles calculations were performed using the relativistic DV-Xα molecular orbital method [2]. At first YO8 clusters with D2 symmetry were constructed based on the crystal structure of Y(Al1-xGax)5O12 [3,4]. Then Ce was substituted for Y and the Ce-O bond lengths were adjusted based on the Shannon’s crystal radii [5] so as to consider the lattice relaxation effect [6]. In order to produce the effective Madelung potential, point charges were located at the atomic sites outside the cluster. As the exchange-correlation potential, the VWN potential [7] with the relativistic correction [8] was adopted. The 4f-5d transition energy was calculated using the Slater’s transition state method [9]. The calculated results showed that the variations of the average energy and the crystal field splitting of 5d levels of Ce3+ depending on x can be understood by the variations of the bond lengths, they are not monotonic. Although the 4f-5d transition energy is basically determined by these factors, interestingly the resultant theoretical 4f-5d transition energy showed monotonic variation. As a result the experimentally observed increasing tendency of the 4f-5d transition energy for increasing x was well reproduced. [1] P. Dorenbos, J. Lumin., 134, 310 (2013). [2] A. Rosén, D.E. Ellis, H. Adachi, and F.W. Averill, J. Chem. Phys., 65, 3629 (1976). [3] A. Nakatsuka, A. Yoshiasa, and S. Takeno, Acta Crystallogr., B51, 737 (1995). [4] A. Nakatsuka, A. Yoshiasa, and T. Yamanaka, Acta Crystallogr., B55, 266 (1999). [5] R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., A32, 751 (1976). [6] S. Watanabe, T. Ishii, K. Fujimura, and K. Ogasawara, J. Solid State Chem., 179, 2438 (2006). [7] S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980). [8] A. H. MacDonald and S. H. Vosko, J. Phys. C12, 2977 (1979). [9] J. C. Slater, Quantum Theory of Molecules and Solids (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974), Vol. 4.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.