Abstract

Scandium (Sc) is a promising candidate for theranostic applications due to the existence of radioisotopes suitable for both imaging and therapy. A “proof-of-concept” study regarding first-in-human use of 44Sc for imaging metastatic neuroendocrine tumours was reported recently, however, quantitative assessment of 44Sc-based PET images was not performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate quantitative capabilities of 44Sc-PET using a commercial PET scanner. The NEMA/IEC body phantom with 44Sc was acquired according to the local protocol used for whole-body oncological [18F]FDG PET examinations. Additionally, we characterised the signal recovery (recovery coefficient - RC) according to the iteration number. For all reconstructions, pertinent image corrections (normalisation, dead time, activity decay, random coincidence and attenuation) were applied. Presently, 44Sc scatter corrections are not optimised and could, thus, result in quantitative bias. To investigate the best option, the data were reconstructed using different available scatter corrections (relative -RelSC- and absolute AbsSC) and an additional prompt-gamma correction (PGC). System cross-calibration with the local dose calibrator (BGcal) and image noise, expressed by the coefficient of variation (COV), were evaluated in the homogeneous background region (5 kBq/mL) of the phantom. Maximum (RCmax) and 50% threshold recovery coefficients, corrected for background (RCA50), were measured for all spherical inserts (25 kBq/mL) of the phantom. Acceptable COV (<15%) was achievable with low iteration numbers (<3). BGcal differences were low: mean BGcal were 77.8% , 81.3% and 86.7%, for RelSC, AbsSC and PGC, respectively. RC values exceeded the present RC range recommended for [18F]FDG procedures. Using the iterations to be evaluated, RCA50 ranged from 29.9% to 59.9% for the smallest lesion (spherical insert of 10 mm diameter) and from 45.5% to 80.3% (13 mm), 66.4% to 75.6% (17 mm), 71.7% to 75.7% (22 mm), 75.1% to 78.6% (28 mm) and 76.7% to 80.9% (37 mm) for the respectively spherical inserts. The results of this study show that clinical 44Sc-PET imaging has the potential to provide signal recovery in lesions of different sizes comparable to current 18F-PET standards. In order to improve the quantitative accuracy of 44Sc PET, optimised corrections are still necessary and will be investigated further in future.

Highlights

  • Clinical theranostic application of 68Ga (T1/2 = 68 min, Eβa+v = 830 keV, I = 89%) and 177Lu (T1/2 = 6.65 d, Eβ− av = 134 keV, I = 100%; Eγ = 113 keV I = 6%, 208 keV I = 10%) is common for PET imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy, respectively

  • Noise level within acceptable ranges (15% was used as level of comparison to [18F]FDG [32]) is achievable with low iteration numbers and increases as the iteration number increases for all evaluated corrections

  • With the results obtained with prompt-gamma correction (PGC), it was observed that the BG calibration improved in relation to the original, and the previously-evaluated relative scatter

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinical theranostic application of 68Ga (T1/2 = 68 min, Eβa+v = 830 keV, I = 89%) and 177Lu (T1/2 = 6.65 d, Eβ− av = 134 keV, I = 100%; Eγ = 113 keV I = 6%, 208 keV I = 10%) is common for PET imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy, respectively. The switch from 111In-based SPECT imaging, such as 111In-octreotide, to the use of 68Ga for PET imaging, represents a cornerstone in nuclear medicine: [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE demonstrated significantly superior image quality and, outperformed 111In-octreotide in both diagnostic accuracy and impact on treatment decisions [6]. A drawback of using 68Ga, is its short half-life of only 68 min (compared to 2.81 d for 111In), which does not allow scanning at late time points after injection nor transportation of 68Ga-based radiopharmaceuticals over longer distances (when a 68Ge/68Ga generator is not present on site). It remains to be mentioned that 68Ga has a different coordination chemistry compared to 177Lu, 68Ga results in different chelator-radiometal complexes and, chemically unequal radiopharmaceuticals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call