First Level 1 Product Results of the Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Instrument on the GaoFen-5 Satellite

Hailiang Shi,Wei Xiong,Haiyan Luo,Xianhua Wang,Zhiwei Li,Hanhan Ye

doi:10.1109/tgrs.2020.2998729

Hailiang Shi, Wei Xiong + Show 4 more

https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2020.2998729

Copy DOI

Export

Save

Cite

Abstract
Full-Text
Similar Papers

Abstract

Listen

The Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Instrument (GMI) is a short-wavelength infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral-resolution spectrometer onboard the Chinese satellite GaoFen-5 that uses a spatial heterodyne spectroscopy (SHS) interferometer to acquire interferograms. The GMI was designed to measure and study the source and sink processes of carbon dioxide and methane in the troposphere where the greenhouse effect occurs. In this study, the processing and geometric correction algorithms of the GMI Level 1 product (radiance spectrum) are introduced. The spectral quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) inversion ability of the Level 1 products are analyzed, and the results illustrate that the specifications meet the mission's requirements. An initial evaluation of the resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and stability of the radiance spectrum reveals that the overall function and performance are within the design objectives. A comparison between our Level 1 products and the theoretical spectrum shows that the root mean square (rms) of the residual is approximately 0.8%, and the Level 1 products of the GMI captured within five months after observations have good spectral stability characteristics (less than 0.005 cm -1 for Band 1, 0.003 cm -1 for Band 2, 0.002 cm -1 for Band 3, and 0.004 cm -1 for Band 4). These results demonstrate that the GMI payload and the processing algorithm all work well and reliably. Furthermore, based on the Level 1 products, a GHG retrieval experiment is carried out, and the results are compared with data from Total Column Carbon Observing Network (TCCON) stations. The initial comparison of the XCO 2 results yields a value of 0.869 for R 2 (goodness of fit), 0.51 ppm for bias (mean of absolute error), and 0.53 ppm for σ (standard deviation of error). Similarly, the XCH 4 comparison yields values of 0.841 for R 2 , 4.64 ppb for bias, and 4.66 ppb for σ.

Full Text