Abstract
In the southeastern USA, lack of historical fire regimes often leads to hardwood encroachment into early successional plant communities and managed pine stands, reducing wildlife value and timber yields. Land managers lack information on how firing technique interacts with fire season to influence plant communities. We designed an experiment to quantify these interactions in east-central Mississippi with pairs of 4 m × 8 m plots randomly assigned a backing and heading fire in each of three seasons: February (Feb), May–June (May/Jun), and September–October (Sep/Oct). We used thermocouples to monitor fire temperature and tagged midstory trees to monitor response. We lit heading fires with an 18–25 kph wind generated by a backpack blower and backing fires into the ambient wind. Despite backing fires producing longer residence times than heading fires and raising temperature above the lethal threshold of 60 °C an average of 54 s longer, firing technique did not influence midstory response one growing season post-fire. Backing and heading fires produced similar maximum temperatures. For both firing techniques, May/Jun resulted in the highest midstory mortality rates which were 3-fold greater than Sep/Oct and 4-fold greater than Feb. Among all three fire seasons, trees with a 2.5 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) had approximately a 75% chance of top-kill which decreased to <20% as trees approached 6.5 cm DBH. We found no effects of fire season on fire temperature, rate of spread, flame height, or percent crown scorch. We found no significant interactions between fire season and firing technique. Understory analysis revealed Sep/Oct produced the greatest increase in forb coverage, May/Jun resulted in the most grass coverage, and Feb produced the most brambles (Rubus spp.). On sites with similar species, weather, and fuel conditions to ours, land managers should emphasize fire season over firing technique for midstory control and understory manipulation. Where midstory hardwood control with fire is a priority, fire return intervals should be frequent enough to prevent trees from exceeding 2.5 cm DBH to avoid trees escaping fire's reach. These data can help managers reduce midstory competition with crop trees and promote understory development for wildlife.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.