Abstract
Suppose S⊆ℝ d is a set of (finite) cardinality n, whose complement can be written as the union of k convex sets. It is perhaps intuitively appealing that when n is large k must also be large. This is true, as is shown here. First the case in which the convex sets must also be open is considered, and in this case a family of examples yields an upper bound, while a simple application of a theorem of Björner and Kalai yields a lower bound. Much cruder estimates are then obtained when the openness restriction is dropped. For a given set S the problem of determining the smallest number of convex sets whose union is ℝ d ∖S is shown to be equivalent to the problem of finding the chromatic number of a certain (infinite) hypergraph ℋ S . We consider the graph $\mathcal {G}_{S}$ whose edges are the 2-element edges of ℋ S , and we show that, when d=2, for any sufficiently large set S, the chromatic number of $\mathcal{G}_{S}$ will be large, even though there exist arbitrarily large finite sets S for which $\mathcal{G}_{S}$ does not contain large cliques.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have