Final results of a FNCLCC French Sarcoma Group multicenter randomized phase II study of gemcitabine (G) versus gemcitabine and docetaxel (G+D) in patients with metastatic or relapsed leiomyosarcoma (LMS)

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

10527 Background: An objective response rate (RR) of 8% and 17% with G and G+D were respectively reported in metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (Maki, J Clin Oncol. 2007). We previously reported a 5% RR in 41 evaluable patients (pts) with ‘non uterus‘ LMS randomized to each arm of this randomized phase II study (Duffaud, ASCO. 2008). We present here the results of G vs G+D in uterine and all LMS. Methods: Patients had histologically proven metastatic or unresectable LMS, one prior anthracycline- based regimen, age ≥18, measurable disease (RECIST), PS ≤ 2. Treatment was G 1,000 mg/m2(over 100 minutes, d1+d8+d15) q28 days (d) or G 900 mg/m2(over 90 min, d1+d8) and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (over 60 min, d8) q21 days; in the G+D arm, pts received lenograstim d9–15, 25% dose reductions were employed for prior pelvic radiation. The primary endpoint was the objective RR (CR+PR), evaluated every 2 cycles. Stratification was by primary tumor location (uterus vs. non-uterus). The Simon method was used: for “uterus” study, 20 pts per arm for a 74% probability of selecting the arm with a real RR of 50%, expected baseline RR was 40%; for the “non-uterus” study, 20 pts per arm for a 92% probability of selecting the arm with a real RR of 40%, expected baseline RR was 20%. Results: From 02/06 to 12/08, 44 pts were enrolled in the “non-uterus” study, 40 pts in the “uterus” study. Currently 76/82 pts are evaluable for response (41/44 in the “non uterus” and 35/38 in the “uterus” study) and 80/84 for toxicity. In the uterus group the median age is 57 (range 41–80), 24 pts received prior pelvic radiotherapy, the median number of cycles was 5 (range 0–8) and dose received/dose planned (%) were 69% in G arm, 88% of G and 86% of D in G+D arm. No differences in toxicity were observed between both LMS locations: in the G arm, toxicity was moderate except for one pulmonary gr4; in the G+D arm one toxic death was related to gr5 thrombocytopenia and there were 2 non-haemathologic gr4 toxicities; 11 pts stopped for intolerable toxicity (3 in G and 8 in G+D arm) and 1 pt for hypersensitivity (G+D arm). Conclusions: Final tumor response for uterine LMS and updated toxicity and PFS data for all the LMS will be presented during the meeting. [Table: see text]