Abstract
This paper considers the continuing controversy concerning the alleged health and interference effects of exposure to electric and magnetic fields (EMFs), the Australian regulation of mobile telephony, and the Australian legal theories by which compensation for alleged loss resulting from exposure to EMFs, might be recovered. In particular, the paper examines whether, in the context of the tort of negligence, public policy considerations or considerations of what is fair, just and reasonable will preclude a duty of care being imposed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
