Abstract
BackgroundThe study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit.MethodsA field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selected from the top and bottom quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation and from urban and rural areas. The FHRS data validity against the field data was measured as Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and sensitivity. Spatial accuracy was evaluated via mean difference in straight line distances between the FHRS coordinates and the field coordinates.ResultsIn all, 182 premises were present in the field, of which 162 were in the FHRS data giving a sensitivity of 89%. Eight outlets recorded in the FHRS data were absent in the field, giving a PPV of 95%.The mean difference in the geographical coordinates of the field audit compared to the FHRS was 110 m, and <100 m for 77% of outlets.ConclusionsAfter an evaluation of the validity and spatial accuracy of the FHRS data, the results suggest that it is a useful dataset for surveillance of the food environment and for intervention evaluation.
Highlights
The food environment is thought to play a role in obesity rates and other chronic health conditions.[1,2] Proximity to fast food outlets is associated with increased obesity, for children.[3]
This study aims to assess the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency (FSA) Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) data using field validation methodology in the North East of England
The results indicate that FHRS data are likely to be superior to commercially available business data or local authorities (LAs) data previously assessed in the UK—Positive Predictive Values (PPV) 95% versus 87%, and Sensitivity 89% versus 87%
Summary
The food environment is thought to play a role in obesity rates and other chronic health conditions.[1,2] Proximity to fast food outlets is associated with increased obesity, for children.[3]. The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme online data through a field audit. The FHRS data validity against the field data was measured as Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and sensitivity. Spatial accuracy was evaluated via mean difference in straight line distances between the FHRS coordinates and the field coordinates. Results In all, 182 premises were present in the field, of which 162 were in the FHRS data giving a sensitivity of 89%. Eight outlets recorded in the FHRS data were absent in the field, giving a PPV of 95%.The mean difference in the geographical coordinates of the field audit compared to the FHRS was 110 m, and
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
