Fidelity's Effect on Student Perceived Preparedness for Patient Care

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore students' perception of how well their learning needs were met by (a) comparing high- versus low-fidelity simulation groups within simulated and traditional clinical environments and (b) comparing simulated versus traditional clinical environments based on high- and low-fidelity groups. MethodThe quasi-experimental study design was implemented with a convenience sample of nursing students enrolled in the fundamental/assessment course and laboratories during the first clinical semester of a five-semester program. ResultsAfter the simulation and traditional clinical experiences were finished, participants completed the Leighton Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey. Participants in the high-fidelity group perceived their learning needs was better that when compared with the low-fidelity group. ConclusionsFidelity of the mock hospital unit simulation as the initial clinical experience did impact the student's perception of how well their learning needs were met. Students perceived high-fidelity simulation as an equal to traditional clinical experience in meeting their learning needs.