Abstract

The article sheds light on some unfamiliar details related to Penal Code Draft for Serbia from 1839, authored by the mayor of Zemun Vasilije Lazarević. As this document to a large extent remained neglected in monographs and articles in relation with codification of criminal law in Serbia in 19th century, the author resolved to explore this topic thoroughly. Archival materials provided solid basis to learn more information in terms of what occurred to forgotten draft after Ministry of Justice had received it. Lazarević consigned his draft to Ministry of Justice between the end of July and beginning of October 1839. Not long afterwards, the Ministry proposed State Council to form a committee tasked with revision of the draft. State Council rejected the proposal, instructing the Ministry to appoint persons to revise the draft on its own. Only when they have finished revision, the draft would be examined by the State Council's committee. In the following year, 1840, Ministry of Justice requested Prince Mihailo Obrenović (1839-1842, 1860-1868) to elect members of the committee to revise Lazarević's draft. Not having jurisdiction over fullfillment of such request, the prince recommended State Council to do so. State Council opted for Minister of Justice Stefan Stefanović-Tenka, legislator Jovan Hadžić, judge of Appellate Court Lazar Zuban and head of Depatment of Police and Economics in Ministry of Internal affairs Stefan Radičević. However, due to turbulent political climate in Serbia, the committee was unable to execute its duty. In 1841, a new comittee was formed by State Council. It was made up of member of State Council Golub Petrović, Minister of Justice Stefan Radičević, head of Department of Quarantine and Sanitation in Ministry of Internal Affairs Jovan Stejić and professor of law Jovan Raić. Existing historical sources and literature reveal contradictory data regarding the committee's activity. The last commission was appointed in 1843, and it included member of State Council Lazar Zuban, head of Department of Ministry of Justice Sava Šilić, president of Belgrade District Court Lazar Arsenijević-Batalaka and legislator Jovan Hadžić. The committee had only partly revised the draft, after which it lied in the archives of State Council. At initiative of Department of Justice, State Council adopted the resolution that new drafts of Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure should be composed, which meant Lazarević's work ceased to represent basis for codification of criminal law. Lacking information on the contents of the draft and observations of committees, available archival materials do not allow to draw resolute conclusions on the topic. Nevertheless, the records of Petrovaradin Border Regiment kept in Croatian State Archives in Zagreb, some of which contain data on early codification of criminal and civil law in Serbia, may potentially offer more explanations to this subject.

Highlights

  • Нормативно регулисање кривичног права од суштинског је значаја за изградњу стабилних друштвених односа у једној земљи

  • 25. јула 1837. су кнезу поднели извештај о садржини нацрта и препорукама за наставак кодификаторског рада

  • У горе наведеном поднеску Државног савета Министарству правде из маја 1845, налази се податак како ће ускоро бити издата наредба да се непрегледани део нацрта прегледа, дотера и спреми за озакоњење.[55]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Нормативно регулисање кривичног права од суштинског је значаја за изградњу стабилних друштвених односа у једној земљи. Али када је требало да Хаџић и он узму учешћа у прегледу норми о министарствима унутрашњих дела и финансија, Лазаревић је замолио владу да га ослободи те дужности како би могао да усмери сву енергију на израду кривичног законика.[11] Већ између краја јула и почетка октобра[12] предао је нацрт кривичног законика Министарству правде.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call