Females with a History of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Exhibit Greater Pressor Responses to Isometric Handgrip and Post-exercise Ischemia Compared to Healthy Females

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) causes acute coronary syndrome via the sudden separation between the coronary arterial wall layers and/or hematoma. The SCAD patient population is >80% female who typically have few or no traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors (e.g., obesity, hypertension). Risk of a recurrent SCAD is reported as high as 19% at 3 years after an initial SCAD. Mechanisms underlying SCAD (re)occurrence are unknown. Common triggers for SCAD include sympathoexcitatory stimuli, including heavy exercise and intense Valsalva-like activities. This study tested the hypothesis that SCAD patients exhibit greater neurocardiovascular responses (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, muscle sympathetic nerve activity) to isometric handgrip and post-exercise ischemia compared to healthy females. Methods: Eight females with a history of SCAD (age: 56±6 yrs, BMI: 28±4 kg/m2) and 6 age- and BMI-matched healthy female controls (CON, age: 55±8 yrs, BMI: 26±5 kg/m2) participated. Continuous blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography) and heart rate (3-lead ECG) were measured during rest (1 minute), isometric handgrip at 30% maximal voluntary contraction (2 minutes), and post-exercise ischemia at 220 mmHg (2 minutes) to isolate the skeletal muscle metaboreflex. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, peroneal microneurography) was measured in a subset of participants (5 SCAD/4 CON). Data are presented as an absolute change from rest (mean±SD). Two-way independent t-tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: Resting mean blood pressure (SCAD: 96±8 vs CON: 91±9 mmHg, p=0.354), heart rate (SCAD: 56±11 vs CON: 59±10 bpm, p=0.666), and MSNA (SCAD: 50±19 vs CON: 43±32 bursts/100 heartbeats, p=0.697) were not different between groups. Relative to healthy controls, SCAD patients elicited greater increases in mean blood pressure during isometric handgrip (SCAD: Δ9±3 vs CON: Δ4±4 mmHg, p=0.034) and post-exercise ischemia (SCAD: Δ7±4 vs CON: Δ3±3 mmHg, p=0.046). There were no group differences regarding heart rate responses during isometric handgrip (SCAD: Δ3±4 vs CON: Δ4±4 bpm, p=0.359) and post-exercise ischemia (SCAD: Δ3±4 vs CON: Δ2±3 bpm, p=0.861). Responses in MSNA during isometric handgrip (SCAD: Δ12±8 vs CON: Δ9±8 bursts/100 heartbeats, p=0.536) and post-exercise ischemia (SCAD: Δ11±2 vs CON: Δ13±10 bursts/100 heartbeats, p=0.713) also were not different between groups. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that compared to healthy females, female patients who experienced a SCAD exhibit greater pressor, but not chronotropic or sympathetic, responses to isometric handgrip and post-exercise ischemia. Exaggerated pressor responses to these perturbations may be a potential risk factor for SCAD (re)occurrence. NIH K23 HL155506, NIH T32 DK07352, NIH K01 HL148144, NIH UL1 TR0022377, and AHA 898649. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.