Abstract
Purpose: to analyze the technical and tactical training of Greco-Roman style wrestlers. Material : an analysis of 75 fights fighters winners (25 fight each style). Results : identified 10 main technical activities that are most commonly used in today's competitive activity of highly skilled fighters. It was found that for all the groups most fighters is received on the ground is a coup coasting. In the front - takedowns. Determined that in order to achieve victory GAME WRESTLERS use high-impact technical actions. POWER AND TEMPO - simple techniques. It was found that high-class fighters may lead the fight in different styles of confrontation. It depends on the personality of the opponent, subjective judging period, cramping, accounts for the fight and the level of competition. Conclusions : It was found that the most informative in assessing the technical and tactical capabilities fighters carries the final part of the competition. It is determined by the efficiency, effectiveness, technical arsenal.
Highlights
The tasks of the work: - to analyze competition functioning of highly qualified wrestlers; - to determine level of technical tactic fitness of highly qualified wrestlers; - to find out contradictions in technical tactic fitness of highly qualified wrestlers with different wrestling styles; - to carry out pedagogic observations over competition functioning of highly qualified wrestlers
Analysis of table 2 permitted to find that effectiveness of attack in stance and in groundwork is insignificantly different for all styles of wrestling: it varies from 45 % (“tempo” wrestlers) to 58% (“power” wrestlers)
We have proved the data of specialists in sport wrestling
Summary
Counter- actions Total in groundwork Stance: 5. TTA: back throws, throws by sub turn, throws by arching and knocking down. Application is explained by the fact that “game” style wrestlers have high coordination. Wrestlers permitted to fulfill more counter techniques in stance and in groundwork. “Power” and “tempo” wrestlers usually fulfill simple (1 point and 2 point) TTA: Pushing behind mat, change over and turnovers. Analysis of table 2 permitted to find that effectiveness of attack in stance and in groundwork is insignificantly different for all styles of wrestling: it varies from 45 % (“tempo” wrestlers) to 58% (“power” wrestlers). Technical tactic indicators of Greco-Rome wrestlers with different wrestling styles “tempo” wrestlers
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
