Abstract

Current cardiorespiratory monitoring equipment can cause injuries and infections in neonates with fragile skin. Impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar was recently demonstrated to be an effective contactless vital sign monitor in adults. The purpose of this study was to assess heart rates (HRs) and respiratory rates (RRs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using IR-UWB radar and to evaluate its accuracy and reliability compared to conventional electrocardiography (ECG)/impedance pneumography (IPG). The HR and RR were recorded in 34 neonates between 3 and 72 days of age during minimal movement (51 measurements in total) using IR-UWB radar (HRRd, RRRd) and ECG/IPG (HRECG, RRIPG) simultaneously. The radar signals were processed in real time using algorithms for neonates. Radar and ECG/IPG measurements were compared using concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and Bland-Altman plots. From the 34 neonates, 12,530 HR samples and 3,504 RR samples were measured. Both the HR and RR measured using the two methods were highly concordant when the neonates had minimal movements (CCC = 0.95 between the RRRd and RRIPG, CCC = 0.97 between the HRRd and HRECG). In the Bland-Altman plot, the mean biases were 0.17 breaths/min (95% limit of agreement [LOA] -7.0-7.3) between the RRRd and RRIPG and -0.23 bpm (95% LOA -5.3-4.8) between the HRRd and HRECG. Moreover, the agreement for the HR and RR measurements between the two modalities was consistently high regardless of neonate weight. A cardiorespiratory monitor using IR-UWB radar may provide accurate non-contact HR and RR estimates without wires and electrodes for neonates in the NICU.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this study was to assess heart rates (HRs) and respiratory rates (RRs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using Impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar and to evaluate its accuracy and reliability compared to conventional electrocardiography (ECG)/impedance pneumography (IPG)

  • The most widely used cardiorespiratory monitoring technologies in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are pulse oximetry based on photoplethysmography, electrocardiography (ECG) and impedance pneumography (IPG) based on electrical potential differences obtained through adhesive electrodes on the skin

  • IPG suffers from inaccuracy and cardiac interference in neonates with rapid respiratory rates (RRs) and limited lung aeration because it is based on breath-dependent thoracic variations in transthoracic impedance [1,2,3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most widely used cardiorespiratory monitoring technologies in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are pulse oximetry based on photoplethysmography, electrocardiography (ECG) and impedance pneumography (IPG) based on electrical potential differences obtained through adhesive electrodes on the skin. IPG suffers from inaccuracy and cardiac interference in neonates with rapid respiratory rates (RRs) and limited lung aeration because it is based on breath-dependent thoracic variations in transthoracic impedance [1,2,3] These instruments have several additional disadvantages resulting from the use of adhesive sensors. Significant attention has been paid to non-contact novel methods for vital sign assessment in neonates [1, 2, 4,5,6,7,8,9] These studies either were explorative with small sample sizes or reported on techniques used to monitor only RR or HR (heart rate) [3, 10,11,12,13]. The purpose of this study was to assess heart rates (HRs) and respiratory rates (RRs) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using IR-UWB radar and to evaluate its accuracy and reliability compared to conventional electrocardiography (ECG)/impedance pneumography (IPG)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call