Feasibility and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation and closing patent foramen ovale without implantation：A pilot study

Abstract

BackgroundPatent foramen ovale (PFO) affects 20%–34% of adults and is associated with strokes and other disorders. The conventional treatment of PFO-related strokes is a closure procedure. The metal device is associated with some adverse events. ObjectiveOur aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PFO closure using cryoablation without implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). MethodsWe divided the 22 patients with both PFO and AF who underwent PVI via cryoablation into 2 groups: standard PVI + atrial septal (AS) cryoablation group (group 1, n = 11) and standard PVI group (group 2, n = 11). The guidewire accesses the left atrium through the PFO without AS puncture during the procedure. Standard PVI via cryoablation was performed. The cryoballoon was retracted to the right atrium and inflated against the AS post-PVI. Patients in group 1 had cryoablation for 120–150 seconds, whereas patients in group 2 received sham ablation. The co-primary end points were the PFO closure rate and a composite of AF recurrence and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) events. ResultsThere were no differences in procedure-related adverse events between the 2 groups. Neither group had an ischemic stroke report at 1-year follow-up. The PFO closure rate at 6 months in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (7 [63.6%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .002). AF recurrence post ablation was comparable in both groups at 3 months (3 [27.3%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .269), 6 months (0 vs 0), and 12 months (2 [18.2%%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .534) of follow-up. ConclusionCryoablation is a safe and effective approach to close PFO in patients with AF undergoing PVI in a single procedure.