Abstract
The present experiment was aimed to study the effect of the bee pollen and probiotic on broiler´s meat fatty acid. A total of 120 one day old chicks, which were divided into 4 groups (n=30). Central, E1 (400 mg.kg-1 bee pollen), E2 (3.3 g probiotic) and E3 (400 mg.kg-1 bee pollen + 3.3 g probiotic) of complete feed mixture, the probiotic has been added through drinking water. After 42 days broiler has been slaughtered to determine meat fatty acid concentrations. We found that the probiotic was increased about (78.9%) of the essential fatty and bee pollen was increased about (68.4%) of essential fatty acid in the experimental groups and there were found significant differences (P≤0.05) in monounsaturated acid (MUFA), heptadecanoic acid and omega-6 between control and E1groups. The mixed between bee pollen and probiotic were reduce the content of the essential fatty acid. However, bee pollen and probiotic were decreased nonessential fatty acid in broiler meat muscles and they were found significant difference (P≤0.05) in saturated fatty acid (SFA) between control and E1, also between control and myristic acid. It was concluded that the bee pollen and probiotic have increased the fatty acid and decrease the non essential fatty acid in broiler meat muscles.
Highlights
For good humans health and other animals must ingest essential fatty acid, because their body can't synthesize fatty acid (Robert et al, 1980)
Table (2) shows the fatty acid content of the broilers meat muscles after were used bee pollen as a supplemental diet into broilers feed mixture and probiotic were added through drinking water
They were found that the myristoleic acid, arachidonicacid, heptadecanoic acid, nervonic acid, cis-11,14-eicosadienoicacid, cis-8,11,14eicosatrienoic acid and cis-5,8,11,14,17 eicosapentaenoic in the experimental groups were higher than control group except E3 it was lower than the control group and they were found significant differences (P≤0.05) in myristoleic acid between E1 and E3 groups, in heptadecanoic acid there were found significant differences (P≤0.05) between E1 and control, E2 and E3 groups
Summary
For good humans health and other animals must ingest essential fatty acid, because their body can't synthesize fatty acid (Robert et al, 1980). Meat should be processed from the meat content high amount of MUFs, by feeding animal with a feed mixture rich of fatty acid (Aronal et al, 2012). In particular the intake of the polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) compared to the intake of saturated fatty acid (SFA) causes a lower fat deposition in the animal (Villaverde et al, 2005). Probiotics are microorganisms that have claimed health benefits when consumed (Ringø et al, 1998). Despite a substantial amount of the basic and clinical research on the beneficial effects of probiotics all of the evaluated claim applications far have received a negative opinion. An open dialogue between basic and clinical scientists, regulatory authorities, food and nutrition industry, and consumers could bridge the gap between science and marketing of probiotics (Rijkers et al, 2011)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
