Abstract
Energy restriction (ER) causes bone loss, but the impact of exercise during ER is less understood. In this study, we examined the impact of metabolic hormones and body composition on both total body bone mineral content (BMC) and local (proximal tibia) volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) during short- (4 weeks) and long-term (12 weeks) ER with and without exercise in adult female rats. Our first goal was to balance energy between sedentary and exercising groups to determine the impact of exercise during ER. Second, we aimed to determine the strongest predictors of bone outcomes during ER with energy-matched exercising groups.Methods: Female Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into three sedentary groups (ad libitum, –20% ER, and –40% ER) and three exercising groups (ad libitum, –10% ER, and –30% ER). Approximately a 10% increase in energy expenditure was achieved via moderate treadmill running (∼60–100 min 4 days/week) in EX groups. n per group = 25–35. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 3 ANOVA with multiple linear regression to predict bone mass outcomes.Results: At 4 weeks, fat and lean mass and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) predicted total body BMC (R2 = 0.538). Fat mass decreased with ER at all levels, while lean mass was not altered. Serum IGF-I declined in the most severe ER groups (–40 and –30%). At 12 weeks, only fat and lean mass predicted total body BMC (R2 = 0.718). Fat mass declined with ER level regardless of exercise status and lean mass increased due to exercise (+5.6–6.7% vs. energy-matched sedentary groups). At the same time point, BMC declined with ER, but increased with exercise (+7.0–12.5% vs. energy-matched sedentary groups). None of our models predicted vBMD at the proximal tibia at either time point.Conclusion: Both fat and lean mass statistically predicted total body BMC during both short- and long-term ER. Fat and lean mass decreased with ER, while lean mass increased with EX at each energy level. Measures that predicted total body skeletal changes did not predict site-specific changes. These data highlight the importance of maintaining lean mass through exercise during periods of ER.
Highlights
Bone mass is closely associated with total body mass in most healthy individuals with higher body weight associated with greater bone mass, presumably due to greater mechanical loading
We confirmed that Adlib + EX rats increased energy intake due to exercise (8.7% greater at week 4 and 9.5% greater at week 12) while body weights between these two groups were not different at either time point
At 4 weeks, body weight in −40ER + SED was lower than −30ER + EX and −20ER + SED was lower than −10ER + EX, with Adlib + SED, and Adlib + EX having the highest values (Figure 1)
Summary
Bone mass is closely associated with total body mass in most healthy individuals with higher body weight associated with greater bone mass, presumably due to greater mechanical loading. There remains some controversy about whether it is the lean or fat component of total body mass that is the greater contributor to higher skeletal mass. When controlling for age and height in a cohort of both pre- and post-menopausal women, both fat mass and lean mass were significant independent predictors of total body bone mineral content (BMC; Khosla et al, 1996). Lean mass is a better predictor of total bone mass; these include young women (Wang et al, 2005), children (Manzoni et al, 1996), as well as middle-aged males and females (Park et al, 2012). In a meta-analysis of over 40 different studies, lean mass was more often demonstrated to have a greater effect on regional and total body bone mineral density (BMD) than did fat mass (Ho-Pham et al, 2014)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
