Abstract
Despite widespread interest in the potential adaptive value of individual differences in cognition, few studies have attempted to address the question of how variation in learning and memory impacts their performance in natural environments. Using a novel split-colony experimental design we evaluated visual learning performance of foraging naïve bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) in an ecologically relevant associative learning task under controlled laboratory conditions, before monitoring the lifetime foraging performance of the same individual bees in the field. We found appreciable variation among the 85 workers tested in both their learning and foraging performance, which was not predicted by colony membership. However, rather than finding that foragers benefited from enhanced learning performance, we found that fast and slow learners collected food at comparable rates and completed a similar number of foraging bouts per day in the field. Furthermore, bees with better learning abilities foraged for fewer days; suggesting a cost of enhanced learning performance in the wild. As a result, slower learning individuals collected more resources for their colony over the course of their foraging career. These results demonstrate that enhanced cognitive traits are not necessarily beneficial to the foraging performance of individuals or colonies in all environments.
Highlights
The question of why cognitive abilities, such as learning and memory, vary so widely within species is one of the most intriguing, yet unanswered, issues surrounding the evolution of cognitive traits[1,2,3,4,5]
We assess whether individual cognitive performance, learning ability, of naïve bumble bee (B. terrestris) workers is correlated with their lifetime foraging performance/contribution to their colony: i.e. do the fastest learners collect more of their colony’s food resources? Learning is of critical importance to flower-visiting insects because they must learn which flowers provide rewards, when these blooms are most productive, where to find rewarding flowers, and how to extract this nectar and pollen[30]
Whilst we found marked differences in the learning performance index (LPI) of individual workers (e.g. Fig. 1a), that varied between 0.1 and 15.8, there was no significant difference in LPI among the five natal colonies (one-way ANOVA F(4,81) = 1.51, P = 0.21)
Summary
The question of why cognitive abilities, such as learning and memory, vary so widely within species is one of the most intriguing, yet unanswered, issues surrounding the evolution of cognitive traits[1,2,3,4,5]. It is commonly assumed that differences in cognitive ability directly affect fitness[6], and whilst studies conducted under controlled laboratory conditions provide some evidence supporting this view[7,8,9,10], it is notoriously difficult to assess what impact variation in cognitive ability has on animal performance in the wild[5, 11, 12]. One reason for this is the difficulty of designing a task simple enough to be used by individuals in the wild, yet sufficiently robust to reveal variation in a focal cognitive trait. We hypothesize that fast learning individuals will be better able to respond to these changing demands and collect more food from flowers during their field foraging career
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have