Abstract

Permeability characterises flow in porous rocks/media for upscaling, while steady-state flow fields allow analysis of reactive transport, fines migration, and tight unconventional rocks. Fast calculation of permeability and flow fields obtained from Pore Network Models (PNM) and Laplace Semi-Analytical Solvers (SAS) deviate from computationally demanding simulation of Navier Stokes Equations (NSE) due to flow and geometry simplifications. Coupling PNM/SAS with direct simulation via Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) provides 5--150× speed-up without accuracy loss over 100 samples from 0.7mD to 3.5D. Permeability errors in PNM/SAS show 10-20% (up to 50-70%) error. PNM shows higher variance from geometric simplifications compared to SAS which only makes flow-based assumptions. PNM/SAS errors are eliminated by coupling with LBM at a fraction of LBM-only compute cost. Steady-state conditions with PNM/SAS-LBM are reached in <2,000 timesteps, compared to LBM-only which can require >105 timesteps in tight domains such as cemented sandstone, carbonate, coal, and shale.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call