Abstract

The powder bed fusion (PBF) process is a type of Additive Manufacturing (AM) technique which enables fabrication of highly complex geometries with unprecedented design freedom. However, PBF still suffers from manufacturing constraints which, if overlooked, can cause various types of defects in the final part. One such constraint is the local accumulation of heat which leads to surface defects such as melt ball and dross formation. Moreover, slow cooling rates due to local heat accumulation can adversely affect resulting microstructures. In this paper, first a layer-by-layer PBF thermal process model, well established in the literature, is used to predict zones of local heat accumulation in a given part geometry. However, due to the transient nature of the analysis and the continuously growing domain size, the associated computational cost is high which prohibits part-scale applications. Therefore, to reduce the overall computational burden, various simplifications and their associated effects on the accuracy of detecting overheating are analyzed. In this context, three novel physics-based simplifications are introduced motivated by the analytical solution of the one-dimensional heat equation. It is shown that these novel simplifications provide unprecedented computational benefits while still allowing correct prediction of the zones of heat accumulation. The most far-reaching simplification uses the steady-state thermal response of the part for predicting its heat accumulation behavior with a speedup of 600 times as compared to a conventional analysis. The proposed simplified thermal models are capable of fast detection of problematic part features. This allows for quick design evaluations and opens up the possibility of integrating simplified models with design optimization algorithms.

Highlights

  • Additive manufacturing (AM) offers unprecedented design freedom as compared to conventional manufacturing techniques

  • The proposed simplified thermal models are capable of fast detection of problematic part features

  • The AM process is not free from manufacturing constraints and, if overlooked, these constraints can cause a wide range of defects in the final part which lead to an increased overall cost

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers unprecedented design freedom as compared to conventional manufacturing techniques. The layer-by-layer material deposition allows for manufacturing functional parts with high geometric complexity. Due to this advantage, AM has already gained significant popularity among manufacturing industries such as automotive, aerospace and medical [1,2]. To fully capitalize on the benefits offered by AM, manufacturing limitations should be considered at the design stage. Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is one of the most common techniques for printing metal parts. It involves sequential deposition of metal powder layers which are selectively molten

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.