Abstract

We propose to combine a physics-based finite element (FE) track model and a data-driven Gaussian process regression (GPR) model to directly infer railpad and ballast stiffness from measured frequency response functions (FRF) by field hammer tests. Conventionally, only the rail resonance and full track resonance are used as the FRF features to identify track stiffness. In this paper, eleven features, including sleeper resonances, from a single FRF curve are selected as the predictors of the GPR. To deal with incomplete measurements and uncertainties in the FRF features, we train multiple candidate GPR models with different features, kernels and training sets. Predictions by the candidate models are fused using a weighted Product of Experts method that automatically filters out unreliable predictions. We compare the performance of the proposed method with a model updating method using the particle swam optimization (PSO) on two synthesis datasets in a wide range of scenarios. The results show that the enriched features and the proposed fusion strategy can effectively reduce prediction errors. In the worst-case scenario with only three features and 5% injected noise, the average prediction errors for the railpad and ballast stiffness are approximately 12% and 6%, outperforming the PSO by about 6% and 3%, respectively. Moreover, the method enables fast predictions for large datasets. The predictions for 400 samples takes only approximately 10 s compared with 40 min using the PSO. Finally, a field application example shows that the proposed method is capable of extracting the stiffness values using a simple setup, i.e., with only one accelerometer and one impact location.

Highlights

  • The stiffness of the ballasted railway track is primarily provided by resilient components such as railpads and ballast

  • We propose a non-iterative method to directly infer the stiffness of railpad and ballast from measured frequency response functions (FRF) features based on the Gaussian process regression (GPR)

  • We propose a new method to directly infer railpad and ballast stiffness from a single FRF using the GPR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The stiffness of the ballasted railway track is primarily provided by resilient components such as railpads and ballast. The fitting process can be achieved by solving an optimization problem, where objective functions defining the difference between modelled and measured FRFs are minimized iteratively. Compared with conventional parametric regression models, the GPR has more expressive power in the sense that it can handle complex datasets (e.g., high-dimensions) with more flexibility [36] Another practical motivation to use the GPR is that it can provide both predictions and confidence intervals, as opposed to other kernel based non-parametric regression methods, such as the support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN), which only offer point estimates. We propose a non-iterative method to directly infer the stiffness of railpad and ballast from measured FRF features based on the GPR.

Overview
FE track model
Gaussian process regression
Two individual cases
Global sensitivity analysis
Dataset preparation
Training multiple GPR models
A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 B4 C1 C2 C3 C4 D1 D2 E1 E2 E3 E4
Prediction fusion
Performance analysis
A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 B4 E1 E2 E3 E4
Numerical examples
Field application example
Limitations of the proposed method
Comparisons between proposed method and previously used techniques
Conclusions
Findings
Objective function FRF FRF
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call