Abstract

In the recent times, we are witnessing turbulent changes in society which cannot be avoided, even by families. These changes began to manifest themselves most markedly at the end of World War I and became more pronounced in the second half of the 20th century. A diverse range of cohabitation forms has emerged. Discussions about these forms have multiplied, with new questions arising. There is still a debate among experts about what form of cohabitation is called "family". Is the family still considered the foundation of the state, the basic building block of society? Despite these shifts in cohabitation, we still consider the family the most stable institution in society. The older functions that the family has fulfilled so far are gradually changing as a result of the current societal changes, and divisions exist only in theoretical considerations. When examining crisis in the family, the position of women in the family is also an important aspect, especially when regarding gender equality. Few studies address the issue that "women's thinking" about the family depends on the myriad of external and internal conditions that women encounter in childhood and during their upbringing. We later transfer these "inner truths" into our behavior when we are adults.
 We cannot ignore the importance of mass media, such as TV, the Internet, the various world communication networks, which are regarded by contemporary sociology as the third factor of socialization, alongside the family and school. Unfortunately, these may be regarded as rather as a factor of negative socialization.

Highlights

  • Families have not escaped the turbulent changes in society

  • Despite certain shifts in cohabitation, we still consider the family to be the most stable institution in society, even though sociologists have different views and questions, such as: whether the family is still considered the foundation of the state, the basic building block of society?

  • Andorka (2003) states that what we call the family is a small cohabiting group, in which members are bound by blood relations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Families have not escaped the turbulent changes in society. Despite certain shifts in cohabitation, we still consider the family to be the most stable institution in society, even though sociologists have different views and questions, such as: whether the family is still considered the foundation of the state, the basic building block of society?. The family still keeps one of the most important functions expected by society, namely the socialization of its offspring. Even the influence of the extended family, which had previously been actively involved in upbringing, has decreased. Where it cannot be effectively represented by the family, the role is taken over by various groups on the streets, namely so-called gangs. A new term is often used: the "lifestyle" of the family This terminology was introduced by Thorstein Veblen (1899/1966). In the area of caring for the sick and elderly, society has failed in providing an equivalent social institution, when needed. Whereas in the previous period, families at risk usually came from a socially weaker environment, nowadays families living in prosperity are becoming ones at risk

Family crisis
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call