Abstract

It is not necessary to document the magnitude and seriousness of the high school dropout problem. For more than a decade now this problem has been one of major concern to education, govern ment, minority groups, and social scientists. It has been estimated that in the 1960's about one-third of American high school students have failed, or will fail, to graduate (S.M. Miller, et al 1964). If pressed, the layman often resorts to poverty and intelligence as explanations of this phenomenon. The accumulated social science research does bear out his notions, but with certain important qualifications. There is, for example, considerable variability among the dropouts. Some middle class and some high I.Q. students do leave school early, and the majority of lower class and low I.Q. youth do in fact graduate. In an effort to go beyond simple description and to provide a more global explanation of premature school withdrawal a number of theoretical approaches have been advanced, each having its own merits. This paper attempts an appraisal and synthesis of two such approaches. The influence approach is exemplified in the work of Cervantes (1965a; 1965b; 1965c) and Elder (1965). Following the lead of Hollingshead (1949), who first suggested that research should focus upon the student's family experience, Cervantes found the

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.