Abstract
This study attempts to compare the performance of Fama–French three-factor model (FFTFM) and Fama and French six-factor model (FFSFM) in predicting the variations in expected returns of Nifty-100 listed stocks. Only 5/6 of the total listed companies are chosen, while the remaining 1/6 are ignored because they are not listed for the whole study period. The stocks are divided into two size groups and three groups based on B/M, OP, Inv and MOM using independent sorts to create 24 portfolios. The monthly average returns of the MC-MOM portfolios increase as momentum increases, in contrast to MC-B/M and MC-Inv portfolios. Almost all the portfolios with high returns are paired with significant risk, apart from the BM portfolio in size and profitability group. The findings prove that the FFSFM outperforms FFTFM on all the GRS test parameters. However, there is no significant improvement in explanatory power over the FFTFM.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
