Abstract
This article is a comparative analysis between the scientific epistemologies of two authors who are fundamental in twentieth-century philosophy of science, Gaston Bachelard and Karl Popper. As it will be seen, there are points of contact between the positions here presented. But thare are also fundamental dibergencies which help us understand in better detail that which the Anglo-Saxon tradition usually calls models of “scientific practice”.
Highlights
Read more 
Summary
Introduction
Results
Conclusion
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Full Text Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
