Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper explores how news media define and frame fake news, thus orienting public perceptions of fake news in terms of problem, causality, responsibilities, and solutions. It first maps the news discourse on fake news through semantic network analysis of 1,646 articles published in 2017–2018 (when the term reached its peak) and 2021–2022. It then analyzes the definitions and frames of fake news in a sample of 122 articles representative of the clusters identified in the previous step of our analysis. The semantic networks in both periods reveal similar dominant actors - political actors, social media platforms and professional journalists – that shape the “fake news” narrative. Fake news is either defined as disinformation and political propaganda or, more often, as false accusations that Donald Trump and his supporters make against mainstream media for their negative reporting. Political and social media actors are mostly held responsible for undermining public trust in mainstream media through fake news dissemination and/or false accusations. In this polarized conception of the public sphere, the public is positioned as a victim rather than an active contributor to the fake news problem and solution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
