Failure of a new double glove hole detection system in the Emergency Department.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new double glove hole detection system in the Emergency Department. First, the frequency of holes in both gloves of the double glove hole detection system was determined using a watertight test method. Second, the frequency of glove puncture was determined first by searching for the optical color change that occurs with the ingress of fluid in the double glove hole detection system. These same gloves were then removed and also checked for holes by the watertight test method. After removal from the package, no holes were detected in the two gloves of the system using the watertight test method. In 50 consecutive patients, there was no color change in the inner glove indicating glove puncture. When these same gloves were then tested with the watertight test method, 14 of the 50 double glove hole detection systems failed; all 14 outer gloves were punctured, and three of the inner gloves had holes without demonstrable injury to the skin. This double glove hole detection system is not a reliable system to detect holes in relatively dry clinical settings because the ingress of fluid by capillary action between the gloves is necessary to cause a color change in the inner glove that signals the presence of a hole.