Abstract

To determine the factors influencing ultrasound breast tumor size assessment accuracy. Five factors (tumor type, molecular subtype, histological size, histological grade, and breast density) were used to assess themeasurement accuracy of breast ultrasound in tumor size. Size underestimation was defined as ultrasound index lesion diameter< histological size by at least 5 mm. Breast ultrasound underestimated tumor size significantly, especially incases with intraductal components (p=0.002). There was a tendency for higher size underestimation in breast cancer tumorswith high-histological grade (p=0.03), human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancertumors (p=0.02) and hormone receptor (HR)-/HER2+ breast cancer tumors (p=0.008). Furthermore, core biopsy revealedhigher probability of size underestimation with intraductal components (p=0.002). Size underestimation was more frequentwith larger histological size (p<0.001). Masses in non-dense breasts were significantly underestimated (p=0.036) compared todense breasts. The size underestimation was influenced by pathological type, molecular subtype, and histologicalsize. The pathological results of core biopsy were conducive for predicting tumor size pre-surgery in precise breast cancer diagnosis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call