Abstract

Beta-diversity, defined as spatial replacement in species composition, is crucial to the understanding of how local communities assemble. These changes can be driven by environmental or geographic factors (such as geographic distance), or a combination of the two. Spiders have been shown to be good indicators of environmental quality. Accordingly, spiders are used in this work as model taxa to establish whether there is a decrease in community similarity that corresponds to geographic distance in the grasslands of the Campos & Malezales ecoregion (Corrientes). Furthermore, the influence of climactic factors and local vegetation heterogeneity (environmental factors) on assemblage composition was evaluated. Finally, this study evaluated whether the differential dispersal capacity of spider families is a factor that influences their community structure at a regional scale. Spiders were collected with a G-Vac from vegetation in six grassland sites in the Campos & Malezales ecoregion that were separated by a minimum of 13 km. With this data, the impact of alpha-diversity and different environmental variables on the beta-diversity of spider communities was analysed. Likewise, the importance of species replacement and nesting on beta-diversity and their contribution to the regional diversity of spider families with different dispersion capacities was evaluated. The regional and site-specific inventories obtained were complete. The similarity between spider communities declined as the geographic distance between sites increased. Environmental variables also influenced community composition; stochastic events and abiotic forces were the principal intervening factors in assembly structure. The differential dispersal capacity of spider groups also influenced community structure at a regional scale. The regional beta-diversity, as well as species replacement, was greater in high and intermediate vagility spiders; while nesting was greater in spiders with low dispersion capacity. Geographic distance, among other factors (climate, and active and passive dispersion capacity), explains assembly structure and the decrease spider community similarity between geographically distant sites. Spiders with the highest dispersal capacity showed greater species replacement. This may be due to the discontinuity (both natural and anthropic) of the grasslands in this ecoregion, which limits the dispersal capacity of these spiders, and their close dependence on microhabitats. The dispersal capacity of the least vagile spiders is limited by geographic distance and biotic factors, such as competition, which could explain the nesting observed between their communities.

Highlights

  • The relative importance of local and regional environmental factors as controllers of local community assembly is a central question in ecology and biogeography (Bell, 2001; Hubbell, 2001; Ricklefs, 2004)

  • The first suggests that similarity decreases with geographic distance because there is a corresponding increase in environmental dissimilarity that provokes greater species replacement

  • This study evaluates whether the differences in the dispersal capacity of spider species influences their community structure at a regional scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relative importance of local and regional environmental factors as controllers of local community assembly is a central question in ecology and biogeography (Bell, 2001; Hubbell, 2001; Ricklefs, 2004). Several authors have associated beta-diversity with environmental or geographic factors, as well as combinations of the two (Tuomisto, Ruokolainen & Yli-Halla, 2003; Legendre, Borcard & Peres-Neto, 2005; Soininen, McDonald & Hillebrand, 2007; Qian, Badgley & Fox, 2009; Jiménez-Valverde et al, 2010; Carvalho et al, 2011), demonstrating that the importance of these factors depends on the group and taxonomic level studied, on spatial scale and the geographic region analysed. The first suggests that similarity decreases with geographic distance because there is a corresponding increase in environmental dissimilarity that provokes greater species replacement. This mechanism supposes that species are distributed according to their distinct and specific requirements and to their tolerance for diverse environmental conditions (Nekola & White, 1999). The decrease in similarity due to increasing distance between communities could be explained by a species own dispersal limit (neutral theory) within a homogeneous space (Hubbell, 2001)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call