Abstract

BackgroundOptimal infant nutrition comprises exclusive breastfeeding, with complementary foods introduced from six months of age. How parents make decisions regarding this is poorly studied. This study begins to address the dearth of research into the decision-making processes used by first-time mothers relating to the introduction of complementary foods.MethodsThis qualitative explorative study was conducted using interviews (13) and focus groups (3). A semi-structured interview guide based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). The TPB, a well-validated decision-making model, identifies the key determinants of a behaviour through behavioural beliefs, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control over the behaviour. It is purported that these beliefs predict behavioural intention to perform the behaviour, and performing the behaviour.A purposive, convenience, sample of 21 metropolitan parents recruited through advertising at local playgroups and childcare centres, and electronically through the University community email list self-selected to participate. Data were analysed thematically within the theoretical constructs: behavioural beliefs, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control. Data relating to sources of information about the introduction of complementary foods were also collected.ResultsOverall, first-time mothers found that waiting until six months was challenging despite knowledge of the WHO recommendations and an initial desire to comply with this guideline. Beliefs that complementary foods would assist the infants’ weight gain, sleeping patterns and enjoyment at meal times were identified. Barriers preventing parents complying with the recommendations included subjective and group norms, peer influences, infant cues indicating early readiness and food labelling inconsistencies. The most valued information source was from peers who had recently introduced complementary foods.ConclusionsFirst-time mothers in this study did not demonstrate a good understanding of the rationale behind the WHO recommendations, nor did they understand fully the signs of readiness of infants to commence solid foods. Factors that assisted waiting until six months were a trusting relationship with a health professional whose practice and advice was consistent with the recommendations and/or when their infant was developmentally ready for complementary foods at six months and accepted them with ease and enthusiasm. Barriers preventing parents complying with the recommendations included subjective and group norms, peer influences, infant cues indicating early readiness and food labelling inconsistencies.

Highlights

  • Optimal infant nutrition comprises exclusive breastfeeding, with complementary foods introduced from six months of age

  • Findings from this study will assist in our understanding of, and answer the research question ‘What decision-making processes are used by first-time mothers when determining the timeliness of introducing complementary foods (CF) to their infant.’

  • Firsttime mothers in this study did not demonstrate a good understanding of the rationale behind the recommendation, nor did they understand fully the signs of readiness of infants to commence solid foods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Optimal infant nutrition comprises exclusive breastfeeding, with complementary foods introduced from six months of age. This study begins to address the dearth of research into the decision-making processes used by first-time mothers relating to the introduction of complementary foods. One of the many dilemmas experienced by first-time breastfeeding mothers is whether and when to introduce complementary foods to their infant’s diet. Findings from this study will assist in our understanding of, and answer the research question ‘What decision-making processes are used by first-time mothers when determining the timeliness of introducing CF to their infant.’. There is broad agreement among health professionals that CFs should not be introduced before four months due to the displacement of breastmilk with foods with lower nutritional quality [5], and increased risk of allergy development [6]. Increased body fat and risk of respiratory and diarrhoeal illness and allergy have been associated with early introduction of CFs [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.