Abstract
AbstractThe calculation of hydraulic conductivity by a modified Millington‐Quirk method with a matching factor gave conductivity values closely approximating experimentally measured values. The technique requires knowledge of the moisture characteristic and the saturated conductivity. A number of factors that affect the calculated values and improve the computational results were investigated. Calculated conductivity values decreased with an increasing number of pressure classes at low moisture contents. For all soils tested the calculated conductivities were less than the experimental values at the terminal point of the moisture characteristic. This discrepancy was partially corrected by a small change in the Millington‐Quirk equation, by extending the moisture characteristics to higher suction values, and by reducing the number of pressure classes to approximately 10. A matching factor, the ratio of measured over calculated saturated conductivity, was found necessary for obtaining the best fit of calculated and measured data. Two conductivity functions calculated separately from each moisture characteristic forming a hysteresis loop, converged as the hysteresis loop was translated to higher tensions. All computations were done by computer.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
