Abstract
To verify the occurrence and factors associated to social, individual and programmatic vulnerability among older adults. A household and cross-sectional survey conducted with 701 community-dwelling older adults. For evaluation of the individual component, we used the frailty phenotype; for the social component, the social vulnerability index was implemented; and for the programmatic component, the Index of access and use of health services. Descriptive and bivariate statistical analyzes and multinomial logistic regression were also carried out (p≤ 0.05). It was verified that 15.7% of the older adults lived in areas of high social vulnerability, 31.8% were physically frail and had a moderate programmatic vulnerability score. Older people of a lower age, having lower education and income levels were more likely to live in areas of high or very high social vulnerability. The female gender and the high age groups increased the chances of the frailty condition. It was also observed that the older adults in the 70├ 80-year age group and having lower education were more likely to have medium programmatic vulnerability. The importance of primary care professionals to consider the multidimensional aspect of vulnerability in identifying older adults who need to be prioritized in health care is evidenced.
Highlights
The term vulnerability is used in public health to designate the susceptibilities of people or communities to health problems and damage[1]
Older people of a lower age, having lower education and income levels were more likely to live in areas of high or very high social vulnerability
It was verified that 15.7% of older adults lived in areas of high social vulnerability, 31.8% were physically frail and had moderate programmatic vulnerability score
Summary
The term vulnerability is used in public health to designate the susceptibilities of people or communities to health problems and damage[1]. Due to the importance of the multidimensional aspect in the gerontology field, the concept of vulnerability is formed in three interdependent dimensions, namely the individual, the social and the programmatic[1], and provides the foundation for the present study. In this model, individual vulnerability is characterized by biological, behavioral and affective aspects that increase susceptibility to adverse health outcomes. The programmatic component refers to the way in which the policies, the programs and the health services influence the problem in question
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have