Abstract

BackgroundRoutine Health Information Systems (RHIS) of low-income countries function below the globally expected standard, characterised by the production and use of poor-quality data, or the non-use of good quality data for informed decision making.This has negatively influenced the health service delivery and uptake. This study focuses on identifying the factors associated with the performance of RHIS of the health facilities (HF) in Yaoundé, so as to guide targeted RHIS strengthening.MethodsA HF-based cross-sectional study in the 6 health districts (HDs) of Yaoundé was conducted. HFs were chosen using stratified sampling with probability proportional to size per HD. Data were collected, entered into Microsoft Excel 2013 and analysed with IBM- SPSS version 25. Consistency of the questionnaire was measured using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Pearson’s chi-square (and Fisher exact where relevant) tests were used to establish relationships between qualitative variables. Associations were further quantified using unadjusted Odd ratio (OR) for univariable analysis and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for multivariable analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsOf 111 selected HFs; 16 (14.4%) were public and 95 (85.6%) private. Respondents aged 24–60 years with an average of 38.3 ± 9.3 years; 58 (52.3%) males and 53(47.7%) females. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95–0.98, p < 0.001), proving that the questionnaire was reliable in measuring RHIS performances. At univariable level, the following factors were positively associated with good performances: supportive supervision (OR = 3.03 (1.1, 8.3); p = 0.02), receiving feedback from hierarchy (OR = 3.6 (0.99, 13.2); p = 0.05), having received training on health information (OR = 5.0 (1.6, 16.0); p = 0.003), and presence of a performance evaluation plan (OR = 3.3 (1.4, 8.2), p = 0.007). At multivariable level, the only significantly associated factor was having received training on health information (aOR = 3.3 (1.01, 11.1), p = 0.04).ConclusionTraining of health staff in the RHIS favors RHIS good performance. Hence, emphasis should be laid on training and empowering staff, frequent and regular RHIS supervision, and frequent and regular feedback, for an efficient RHIS strengthening in Yaoundé.

Highlights

  • Routine Health Information Systems (RHIS) of low-income countries function below the globally expected standard, characterised by the production and use of poor-quality data, or the non-use of good quality data for informed decision making.This has negatively influenced the health service delivery and uptake

  • Following Tamfon et al [17] who determine the inadequate functionality of the RHIS of the health facilities (HF) in Yaoundé, this study aims at identifying associated factors to good performance of the RHIS in Yaoundé; so as to guide targeted RHIS strengthening, and enable the re-orientation of the limited strengthening resources

  • Overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96 (95%confidence interval (CI): 0.95–0.98, p < 0.001), proving that the questionnaire was reliable in measuring RHIS performances

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Routine Health Information Systems (RHIS) of low-income countries function below the globally expected standard, characterised by the production and use of poor-quality data, or the non-use of good quality data for informed decision making.This has negatively influenced the health service delivery and uptake. A good HIS ensures the availability of good quality data and its use to support the informed decision-making process [2–4] This highlights the importance of both the production of quality data and the use of the data for decision making at every level of the health pyramid. The RHIS of low-income countries experiences difficulties functioning at the globally expected standard, with respect to good data management and interpretation skills [5] These systems are characterized by either the production and use of poor-quality data, or the non-use of good quality data by decision-makers, which negatively influence the delivery and uptake of health services [3–5]. Routine health information (RHI) availability permits a regular evaluation of the public health interventions both at the sub-national and national levels as well as an evaluation of HS strengthening interventions [6, 7] even though this has not been a regular practice in so many settings

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call